# Hood Warfare 2: Game Sound Works, but Voice Is Silent Use a receiver-first comparison when game audio works but player speech does not. Separate missing incoming voice, sender input and audience assumptions. Canonical: https://hood-warfare.com/hood-warfare-2/insights/game-sound-but-no-voice/ Published: 2026-10-31 Updated: 2026-10-24 Page reviewed: 2026-10-31 Evidence: Source-based editorial analysis; community claims retain their attribution Version scope: Developer announcements: 1.0.1.4, 1.0.10. Later builds have not been verified here. ## Quick answer Use a receiver-first comparison when game audio works but player speech does not. Separate missing incoming voice, sender input and audience assumptions. ## What does hearing the game actually confirm? Patch 1.0.1.4 tells players with no game sound to select an audio output device in settings. That is useful for a silent game, but it does not establish a separate voice-output selector or guarantee a repair for missing conversation. Keep the distinction so a working sound path is not repeatedly changed without a reason. Reference: https://steamcommunity.com/gid/103582791475829503/announcements/detail/672882996184875072 ## How can you test incoming voice with one willing friend? Keep the listener’s device and session steady for the first repeat. Then reverse roles and test A-to-B separately. If only one direction fails, follow the linked one-way conversation case. If neither direction works, do not conclude that both microphones are broken: session membership, transmission and reception are still separate possibilities. ## What should the sender confirm before you change output? If there is still no intelligible phrase, ask B to establish whether their local microphone capture works using the operating-system checks in the linked voice guide. A successful local recording tests capture there; it does not prove the game transmitted it. Keep B’s input investigation distinct from A’s already audible game output. Reference: https://steamcommunity.com/gid/103582791475829503/announcements/detail/689770861148769834 ## What changes if another person can hear the same sender? If a second consenting listener C is available in the intended conversation, repeat B’s phrase and ask A and C independently what they heard. C hearing B while A does not creates a useful receiver-side comparison. It still does not prove that a particular device setting, network condition or game defect caused A’s silence. If neither listener hears B, preserve that result and revisit B’s transmission conditions. If no second listener is available, write “not compared” rather than treating the missing test as a failure. Do not move everyone between sessions and change several audio choices at once, because the next result would be harder to interpret. ## Does choosing team chat prove incoming speech is filtered? Lord Agatha’s October 28 review alleges that team speech was audible outside the intended team. It is a player observation without a controlled recording or developer confirmation in the reviewed material. It cannot establish a universal routing rule or explain why your particular teammate is silent. Treat the audience selector as something to check, not as a verified incoming mute filter. For this comparison, record the intended team relationship and speech audience. Do not promise that choosing team speech will suppress other voices, restore missing speech or make sensitive conversation private. Reference: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198164876346/recommended/5155360/ ## What counts as a useful result when voice stays silent? A successful result is the agreed phrase reaching the intended listener under recorded conditions. Hearing an unrelated player once, or seeing a setting enabled, is a different observation. Keep the working device, build and speech mode so a later recurrence has a concrete comparison. For an unresolved report, include which directions failed, whether game sound remained audible, the sender’s local capture result if tested, and any second-listener comparison. A crash during speech belongs in a crash report, not a silent-voice diagnosis. The linked no-audio and voice guides provide the broader support routes without treating this exercise as a guaranteed fix. ## Common questions ### What does hearing the game actually confirm? If you hear the match but no teammate speech, begin with incoming voice rather than repeating a complete no-sound checklist. Audible game sound shows that some game audio reached your listening device during that session. It does not demonstrate that another player transmitted speech, or that an incoming voice stream reached the same listener. ### How can you test incoming voice with one willing friend? Use this proposed comparison, not an assumed diagnosis: you are listener A and your friend is sender B. Agree on one short phrase and confirm that both of you are in the intended session. Have B use the actual selected speech action while A reports whether the phrase was heard. Record that direction as B-to-A. ### What should the sender confirm before you change output? The 1.0.10 announcement introduced voice chat with push-to-talk, originally defaulting to T, or open mic, plus team/lobby preferences. B should check the actual selected mode and current binding rather than assume that talking alone transmits. A remembered default does not override a custom binding or later build. ## Revision history 2026-10-31 — Compared the named source material and recorded the limits of the conclusions. ## Sources and scope - [Patch 1.0.10 · Developer announcement](https://steamcommunity.com/gid/103582791475829503/announcements/detail/689770861148769834): Voice chat, T push-to-talk default, reporting, spawn adjustments, supermarket reference and preset/progression fixes; posted 2026-10-12 UTC; checked 2026-10-17. - [Patch 1.0.1.4 · Developer announcement](https://steamcommunity.com/gid/103582791475829503/announcements/detail/672882996184875072): Password private matches, audio output selection, false anti-cheat kicks, join/crash fixes and version check; posted 2026-10-14 UTC; checked 2026-10-17. - [Lord Agatha: Hood Warfare 2 review](https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198164876346/recommended/5155360/): Player reports exposed Destroy The Block spawn and team-voice audience concerns; dated opinion, no controlled reproduction.; checked 2026-10-31. Interactive tools are available on the canonical HTML page. This text does not include personal browser notes.